<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 1511 - ITAT VARANASI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456540</link>
    <description>ITAT Varanasi-AT allowed the appeal and directed CIT (Exemptions) to grant registration under section 12AB to the trust. The court found that expenditures on medical aid, help to poor, charity to sadhus, administrative work, and building repairs were clearly related to charitable activities. The authority failed to specify which expenditures were non-charitable and wrongly classified all expenses as unrelated to charitable objects. Administrative expenses were deemed necessary for carrying out trust activities. The court noted similar activities were previously accepted and expenditures were properly explained in replies to show cause notices, which weren&#039;t adequately considered by CIT (Exemptions).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2024 14:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 1511 - ITAT VARANASI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456540</link>
      <description>ITAT Varanasi-AT allowed the appeal and directed CIT (Exemptions) to grant registration under section 12AB to the trust. The court found that expenditures on medical aid, help to poor, charity to sadhus, administrative work, and building repairs were clearly related to charitable activities. The authority failed to specify which expenditures were non-charitable and wrongly classified all expenses as unrelated to charitable objects. Administrative expenses were deemed necessary for carrying out trust activities. The court noted similar activities were previously accepted and expenditures were properly explained in replies to show cause notices, which weren&#039;t adequately considered by CIT (Exemptions).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>