https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456544 The court dismissed the application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, determining that the second and third defendants were necessary and proper parties to the suit. The court concluded that their presence was essential for effective adjudication, as the plaintiff's allegations and evidence suggested their involvement in pre-contractual misrepresentation and personal liability. en-us Thu, 17 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 Jul 2024 20:21:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456544 The court dismissed the application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, determining that the second and third defendants were necessary and proper parties to the suit. The court concluded that their presence was essential for effective adjudication, as the plaintiff's allegations and evidence suggested their involvement in pre-contractual misrepresentation and personal liability. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 17 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456544