<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1500 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456548</link>
    <description>A contract clause providing escalation becomes enforceable when its stipulated conditions are satisfied, including the existence of circumstances beyond the contractor&#039;s control and the required written permission. A later claim based on subsequent factual developments, such as an inspection report and authorised use of an alternate quarry, is treated as distinct from an earlier arbitral reference and is not barred by res judicata. Revisional interference under the Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam is limited to jurisdictional error, illegality, material irregularity, misconduct, or invalid procurement of the award; absent such infirmity, the award is maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2024 20:21:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762388" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1500 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456548</link>
      <description>A contract clause providing escalation becomes enforceable when its stipulated conditions are satisfied, including the existence of circumstances beyond the contractor&#039;s control and the required written permission. A later claim based on subsequent factual developments, such as an inspection report and authorised use of an alternate quarry, is treated as distinct from an earlier arbitral reference and is not barred by res judicata. Revisional interference under the Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam is limited to jurisdictional error, illegality, material irregularity, misconduct, or invalid procurement of the award; absent such infirmity, the award is maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456548</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>