<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1740 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456552</link>
    <description>The HC directed the respondent Department to provisionally release the detained cargo, subject to the petitioner furnishing a bond for the full value and a bank guarantee for 25% of the proposed Anti-Dumping Duty. The petitioner successfully argued the goods originated from Bosnia, not Croatia. The Department may issue a show cause notice and continue adjudication without imposing costs on the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2024 20:21:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1740 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456552</link>
      <description>The HC directed the respondent Department to provisionally release the detained cargo, subject to the petitioner furnishing a bond for the full value and a bank guarantee for 25% of the proposed Anti-Dumping Duty. The petitioner successfully argued the goods originated from Bosnia, not Croatia. The Department may issue a show cause notice and continue adjudication without imposing costs on the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456552</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>