https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456528 Article 226 writ relief against a private employer is generally unavailable where termination arises from a purely contractual employment relationship, because mandamus ordinarily enforces public or statutory duties and requires a public law element. The Court distinguished public sector and statutory body cases on arbitrary termination and public policy, holding that those principles do not automatically apply to ordinary private employment contracts. The termination clause and termination orders were therefore not struck down in writ jurisdiction under public policy or Section 23 of the Contract Act, and any challenge was left to ordinary civil or labour remedies. en-us Mon, 08 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 Jul 2024 17:08:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456528 Article 226 writ relief against a private employer is generally unavailable where termination arises from a purely contractual employment relationship, because mandamus ordinarily enforces public or statutory duties and requires a public law element. The Court distinguished public sector and statutory body cases on arbitrary termination and public policy, holding that those principles do not automatically apply to ordinary private employment contracts. The termination clause and termination orders were therefore not struck down in writ jurisdiction under public policy or Section 23 of the Contract Act, and any challenge was left to ordinary civil or labour remedies. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 08 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456528