https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456525 Teachers of a private unaided minority school cannot enforce parity of salary and allowances with teachers of Government or Government-aided schools through Article 14, Article 39(d), or a writ of mandamus, because the school pays from its own resources and retains constitutional autonomy under Article 30(1); in the absence of a statutory or executive mandate, pay structure remains contractual and outside an enforceable public law duty. The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 nevertheless empowers the State to prescribe teachers' salary and service conditions through rules under Sections 23(3) and 38(2)(l), and such rule-making should take equal pay principles into account. en-us Thu, 11 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 Jul 2024 16:06:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456525 Teachers of a private unaided minority school cannot enforce parity of salary and allowances with teachers of Government or Government-aided schools through Article 14, Article 39(d), or a writ of mandamus, because the school pays from its own resources and retains constitutional autonomy under Article 30(1); in the absence of a statutory or executive mandate, pay structure remains contractual and outside an enforceable public law duty. The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 nevertheless empowers the State to prescribe teachers' salary and service conditions through rules under Sections 23(3) and 38(2)(l), and such rule-making should take equal pay principles into account. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 11 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456525