<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Order Violates Natural Justice: Case Remanded for Reply and Hearing Under GST Act, 2017. Fundamental Rights Upheld.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79943</link>
    <description>The impugned order was passed without considering the reply filed by the petitioner and without affording an opportunity of personal hearing, despite a request being made, thereby violating the principles of natural justice. The provisions u/ss 73(9), 73(10), and 75(4) of the Act, 2017 mandate the requirement of providing an opportunity of filing a reply and personal hearing, as the word used is &#039;shall&#039;. The matter was remanded to grant another opportunity to the petitioner to participate and make out a reply to the show cause notice, as the substantive rights were involved. The petition was allowed, as passing the order without considering the reply and denying personal hearing amounted to a breach of fundamental rights and violation of principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2024 08:38:38 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2024 08:38:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762351" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Order Violates Natural Justice: Case Remanded for Reply and Hearing Under GST Act, 2017. Fundamental Rights Upheld.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79943</link>
      <description>The impugned order was passed without considering the reply filed by the petitioner and without affording an opportunity of personal hearing, despite a request being made, thereby violating the principles of natural justice. The provisions u/ss 73(9), 73(10), and 75(4) of the Act, 2017 mandate the requirement of providing an opportunity of filing a reply and personal hearing, as the word used is &#039;shall&#039;. The matter was remanded to grant another opportunity to the petitioner to participate and make out a reply to the show cause notice, as the substantive rights were involved. The petition was allowed, as passing the order without considering the reply and denying personal hearing amounted to a breach of fundamental rights and violation of principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2024 08:38:38 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>