<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1506 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756286</link>
    <description>Regular bail was granted where the petitioner had remained in custody since 21.01.2021, investigation had concluded and the final report had been filed. The offences were triable by a Magistrate, so continued incarceration was found to serve no useful purpose. The existence of other criminal cases was treated as only one relevant circumstance and not, by itself, a decisive ground to deny bail when the petitioner otherwise satisfied the requirements for release.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2024 10:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1506 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756286</link>
      <description>Regular bail was granted where the petitioner had remained in custody since 21.01.2021, investigation had concluded and the final report had been filed. The offences were triable by a Magistrate, so continued incarceration was found to serve no useful purpose. The existence of other criminal cases was treated as only one relevant circumstance and not, by itself, a decisive ground to deny bail when the petitioner otherwise satisfied the requirements for release.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>