<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1482 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756262</link>
    <description>The ITAT Kolkata set aside an addition of 21% made by the AO for alleged unexplained deposits based on differences between bank statement deposits and book accounts. The tribunal found the AO erred in matching net decrease in loans and advances from balance sheet with bank statement credits/receipts. Since no actual difference existed as claimed by the AO in the assessment order framed after PCIT directions, the CIT(Appeals) finding was overturned and the addition under section 143(3) was deleted. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2024 10:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762306" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1482 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756262</link>
      <description>The ITAT Kolkata set aside an addition of 21% made by the AO for alleged unexplained deposits based on differences between bank statement deposits and book accounts. The tribunal found the AO erred in matching net decrease in loans and advances from balance sheet with bank statement credits/receipts. Since no actual difference existed as claimed by the AO in the assessment order framed after PCIT directions, the CIT(Appeals) finding was overturned and the addition under section 143(3) was deleted. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756262</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>