<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1472 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756252</link>
    <description>The ITAT Cochin upheld the AO&#039;s decision to disallow 50% of repossession charges claimed by an assessee engaged in asset recovery services for banks. The assessee provided only an unverifiable list of 400 purported &quot;influential persons&quot; without proof of identity or locality-wise details. The Tribunal found the evidence sketchy and lacking evidentiary value, describing it as &quot;make-believe&quot; documentation. Given the complete non-verifiability of the claimed expenditure, the Tribunal deemed the 50% disallowance reasonable under estimation principles established in precedent cases. The assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2024 08:36:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762289" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1472 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756252</link>
      <description>The ITAT Cochin upheld the AO&#039;s decision to disallow 50% of repossession charges claimed by an assessee engaged in asset recovery services for banks. The assessee provided only an unverifiable list of 400 purported &quot;influential persons&quot; without proof of identity or locality-wise details. The Tribunal found the evidence sketchy and lacking evidentiary value, describing it as &quot;make-believe&quot; documentation. Given the complete non-verifiability of the claimed expenditure, the Tribunal deemed the 50% disallowance reasonable under estimation principles established in precedent cases. The assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756252</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>