<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1469 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756249</link>
    <description>The CESTAT NEW DELHI ruled in favor of the appellant regarding classification of imported goods under CTI 6102 30 10, CTI 6202 9390 and CTI 6210 5000. The tribunal held that section 28(4) of the Customs Act could not be invoked as there was no willful suppression of facts, only mis-classification. The appellant had declared goods details which were physically examined, and customs authorities had previously permitted clearance under the same classification. The Commissioner&#039;s order dated 24.02.2023 established no willful suppression existed, making sections 111 and 114A also inapplicable. The impugned order was set aside and appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2024 08:36:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762284" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1469 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756249</link>
      <description>The CESTAT NEW DELHI ruled in favor of the appellant regarding classification of imported goods under CTI 6102 30 10, CTI 6202 9390 and CTI 6210 5000. The tribunal held that section 28(4) of the Customs Act could not be invoked as there was no willful suppression of facts, only mis-classification. The appellant had declared goods details which were physically examined, and customs authorities had previously permitted clearance under the same classification. The Commissioner&#039;s order dated 24.02.2023 established no willful suppression existed, making sections 111 and 114A also inapplicable. The impugned order was set aside and appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>