<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1467 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756247</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal due to lack of territorial jurisdiction, directing the Appellant to approach the Karnataka HC. The Court held that the alleged misconduct of the company occurred in Karnataka, where the company&#039;s registered office is located, making it the appropriate jurisdiction under the doctrine of forum conveniens.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2024 08:36:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762281" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1467 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756247</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal due to lack of territorial jurisdiction, directing the Appellant to approach the Karnataka HC. The Court held that the alleged misconduct of the company occurred in Karnataka, where the company&#039;s registered office is located, making it the appropriate jurisdiction under the doctrine of forum conveniens.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>