<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Call Option Fee not liable for service tax, being derivative under SCRA, not service as per Finance Act. SC discussed it in Vodafone case.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79913</link>
    <description>Detailed legal analysis regarding levy of service tax on &#039;Call Option Fee&#039; during 2007-08 to 2013-14. Held that &#039;Call Option&#039; is a derivative or right in securities under Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 (SCRA), hence a transaction in goods not subject to service tax under Finance Act, 1994. Supreme Court in Vodafone case discussed &#039;Call Options&#039; without indicating illegality. Consideration for Call Option, not for ancillary requirement of holding shares. Call options fall under activities excluded from &#039;service&#039; definition u/s 65B(44). Extended period of limitation wrongly invoked without evidence of intent to evade tax. Penalty wrongly imposed as no deliberate deception to evade duty. Order set aside, appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2024 08:35:44 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2024 08:35:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Call Option Fee not liable for service tax, being derivative under SCRA, not service as per Finance Act. SC discussed it in Vodafone case.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79913</link>
      <description>Detailed legal analysis regarding levy of service tax on &#039;Call Option Fee&#039; during 2007-08 to 2013-14. Held that &#039;Call Option&#039; is a derivative or right in securities under Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 (SCRA), hence a transaction in goods not subject to service tax under Finance Act, 1994. Supreme Court in Vodafone case discussed &#039;Call Options&#039; without indicating illegality. Consideration for Call Option, not for ancillary requirement of holding shares. Call options fall under activities excluded from &#039;service&#039; definition u/s 65B(44). Extended period of limitation wrongly invoked without evidence of intent to evade tax. Penalty wrongly imposed as no deliberate deception to evade duty. Order set aside, appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2024 08:35:44 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>