<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 1394 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456499</link>
    <description>ITAT Hyderabad set aside PCIT&#039;s revision order u/s 263 regarding unaccounted property investments. The tribunal held that AO&#039;s assessment was legally sustainable as partners had admitted cash payments as undisclosed income during search proceedings, which was properly taxed in their hands. PCIT&#039;s attempt to additionally tax the same amount in the firm&#039;s hands would constitute double taxation. Since AO took a possible view by avoiding double taxation and properly assessed amounts per sale deeds in relevant assessment years, PCIT lacked jurisdiction to invoke s.263 merely due to disagreement with AO&#039;s approach.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2024 20:10:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762228" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 1394 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456499</link>
      <description>ITAT Hyderabad set aside PCIT&#039;s revision order u/s 263 regarding unaccounted property investments. The tribunal held that AO&#039;s assessment was legally sustainable as partners had admitted cash payments as undisclosed income during search proceedings, which was properly taxed in their hands. PCIT&#039;s attempt to additionally tax the same amount in the firm&#039;s hands would constitute double taxation. Since AO took a possible view by avoiding double taxation and properly assessed amounts per sale deeds in relevant assessment years, PCIT lacked jurisdiction to invoke s.263 merely due to disagreement with AO&#039;s approach.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456499</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>