<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (3) TMI 7 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37675</link>
    <description>Reassessment under the Agricultural Income-tax Act is lawful where the original assessment has escaped assessment or taxed income at too low a rate. The requirement to record reasons is satisfied if the reasons are entered in the file; they need not be communicated to the assessee. Where the assessee was originally assessed in the wrong status, the reassessment jurisdiction was properly attracted. A challenge to the notice for missing section 17(2) particulars was not entertained when that objection had not been raised before the department and was advanced only in writ proceedings. The reassessment notices and revised assessments were therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:03:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76221" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (3) TMI 7 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37675</link>
      <description>Reassessment under the Agricultural Income-tax Act is lawful where the original assessment has escaped assessment or taxed income at too low a rate. The requirement to record reasons is satisfied if the reasons are entered in the file; they need not be communicated to the assessee. Where the assessee was originally assessed in the wrong status, the reassessment jurisdiction was properly attracted. A challenge to the notice for missing section 17(2) particulars was not entertained when that objection had not been raised before the department and was advanced only in writ proceedings. The reassessment notices and revised assessments were therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>