https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756229 Proceedings for detention of goods and the vehicle under the GST regime were already underway after interception showed an expired e-way bill and a mismatch in vehicle particulars. As the matter was still pending adjudication and the petitioner had been given a further hearing date, judicial interference and immediate release of the consignments were not warranted at that stage. The authorized officer was directed to complete the proceedings in accordance with law after granting an opportunity of hearing, and to consider release of the consignments if the requisite security under section 129 was furnished in an encashable form. en-us Wed, 24 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 May 2025 16:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756229 Proceedings for detention of goods and the vehicle under the GST regime were already underway after interception showed an expired e-way bill and a mismatch in vehicle particulars. As the matter was still pending adjudication and the petitioner had been given a further hearing date, judicial interference and immediate release of the consignments were not warranted at that stage. The authorized officer was directed to complete the proceedings in accordance with law after granting an opportunity of hearing, and to consider release of the consignments if the requisite security under section 129 was furnished in an encashable form. Case-Laws GST Wed, 24 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756229