<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1444 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756224</link>
    <description>The HC declined to interfere with the Order-in-Original (OIO) dated 03.04.2024, emphasizing the availability of an alternative appellate remedy under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner failed to demonstrate a jurisdictional error or constitutional challenge in the OIO. The writ petition was disposed of, granting the petitioner liberty to pursue the statutory remedy, and any pending interlocutory applications were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2024 10:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1444 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756224</link>
      <description>The HC declined to interfere with the Order-in-Original (OIO) dated 03.04.2024, emphasizing the availability of an alternative appellate remedy under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner failed to demonstrate a jurisdictional error or constitutional challenge in the OIO. The writ petition was disposed of, granting the petitioner liberty to pursue the statutory remedy, and any pending interlocutory applications were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756224</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>