<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessee&#039;s Appeal Allowed: CIT(E) to Reassess Section 80G(5) Application After Error in Code Selection and Evidence Overlooked.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79890</link>
    <description>The assessee wrongly selected an incorrect section code while applying for registration u/s 80G(5), but acknowledged the mistake and offered to resubmit the application. Despite clarifications provided regarding religious expenditure, vegan food center, non-audit of financial statements, animal welfare activities, and donations received, supported by relevant evidence and case law, the CIT(E) did not consider these. The matter is remanded for fresh adjudication by the CIT(E) after affording adequate opportunity of hearing to the assessee, considering all available material on record. The appeal is treated as allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2024 08:09:47 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2024 08:09:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762143" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessee&#039;s Appeal Allowed: CIT(E) to Reassess Section 80G(5) Application After Error in Code Selection and Evidence Overlooked.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79890</link>
      <description>The assessee wrongly selected an incorrect section code while applying for registration u/s 80G(5), but acknowledged the mistake and offered to resubmit the application. Despite clarifications provided regarding religious expenditure, vegan food center, non-audit of financial statements, animal welfare activities, and donations received, supported by relevant evidence and case law, the CIT(E) did not consider these. The matter is remanded for fresh adjudication by the CIT(E) after affording adequate opportunity of hearing to the assessee, considering all available material on record. The appeal is treated as allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2024 08:09:47 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>