https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756204 The ITAT PUNE allowed the assessee's appeal against rejection of 80G(5) registration application. The assessee had mistakenly selected wrong section code 13 instead of correct code 14 in the application and offered to resubmit. Despite providing detailed explanations regarding religious expenditure limits under 80G(5B), clarifications on temple expenses, vegan food center operations, and supporting evidence including precedent case law, the CIT(E) failed to consider these submissions. The ITAT set aside the order and remanded the matter to CIT(E) for fresh decision on merits with adequate hearing opportunity. en-us Wed, 24 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Jul 2024 10:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756204 The ITAT PUNE allowed the assessee's appeal against rejection of 80G(5) registration application. The assessee had mistakenly selected wrong section code 13 instead of correct code 14 in the application and offered to resubmit. Despite providing detailed explanations regarding religious expenditure limits under 80G(5B), clarifications on temple expenses, vegan food center operations, and supporting evidence including precedent case law, the CIT(E) failed to consider these submissions. The ITAT set aside the order and remanded the matter to CIT(E) for fresh decision on merits with adequate hearing opportunity. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 24 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756204