https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756178 CESTAT Mumbai allowed appeal in part regarding CENVAT credit denial for input services during March 2009 to May 2013. Tribunal relied on precedents from Delhi, Udaipur, Mumbai, and Bangalore establishing disputed services as qualifying input services under Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Appellant conceded Rent-a-Cab service post April 1, 2011 was ineligible due to definitional exceptions. Order modified to confirm demand only for Rent-a-Cab service from April 1, 2011 with interest; remaining demands set aside. en-us Thu, 25 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Jul 2024 08:08:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756178 CESTAT Mumbai allowed appeal in part regarding CENVAT credit denial for input services during March 2009 to May 2013. Tribunal relied on precedents from Delhi, Udaipur, Mumbai, and Bangalore establishing disputed services as qualifying input services under Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Appellant conceded Rent-a-Cab service post April 1, 2011 was ineligible due to definitional exceptions. Order modified to confirm demand only for Rent-a-Cab service from April 1, 2011 with interest; remaining demands set aside. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 25 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756178