<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1391 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756171</link>
    <description>An appeal cannot be decided on merits against an absent appellant unless the governing statute clearly authorises that course. The Court read the ex parte power in the U.P. Value Added Tax Rules as relating to absence of the respondent, not as permitting a merits-based determination against the appellant. Deciding the second appeal ex parte on merits was held inconsistent with fair hearing and natural justice, so the ex parte merits order was set aside and the matter restored for fresh adjudication after hearing both sides.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2024 10:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1391 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756171</link>
      <description>An appeal cannot be decided on merits against an absent appellant unless the governing statute clearly authorises that course. The Court read the ex parte power in the U.P. Value Added Tax Rules as relating to absence of the respondent, not as permitting a merits-based determination against the appellant. Deciding the second appeal ex parte on merits was held inconsistent with fair hearing and natural justice, so the ex parte merits order was set aside and the matter restored for fresh adjudication after hearing both sides.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>