https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756169 Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act bars civil court jurisdiction where the dispute concerns measures taken under Section 13(4) and the remedy lies before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, so a plaint directly challenging such measures is liable to rejection under Order VII Rule 11(d). A mere assertion of fraud does not bypass that bar unless fraud is pleaded with specific particulars under Order VI Rule 4 of the CPC; a bald plea is insufficient. In second appeal, no substantial question of law arose under Section 100 CPC because the findings rested on the statutory bar and the inadequacy of the fraud plea. en-us Tue, 02 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Jul 2024 11:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756169 Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act bars civil court jurisdiction where the dispute concerns measures taken under Section 13(4) and the remedy lies before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, so a plaint directly challenging such measures is liable to rejection under Order VII Rule 11(d). A mere assertion of fraud does not bypass that bar unless fraud is pleaded with specific particulars under Order VI Rule 4 of the CPC; a bald plea is insufficient. In second appeal, no substantial question of law arose under Section 100 CPC because the findings rested on the statutory bar and the inadequacy of the fraud plea. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 02 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756169