<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 2180 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456479</link>
    <description>Land shown in revenue records as agricultural or cultivable, remaining outside municipal limits and never converted for non-agricultural use, was treated as agricultural land on a cumulative appraisal of all relevant facts; the sale gain was therefore not chargeable as capital gains and, on those facts, was not includible in book profit under section 115JB. A small existing structure on a negligible portion did not alter the character of the whole property, and the absence of declared agricultural income was not conclusive. However, an amount received under a compromise, settlement and withdrawal of litigation was not treated as sale consideration for the agricultural land, so it did not qualify for exemption and was taxable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2024 20:13:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 2180 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456479</link>
      <description>Land shown in revenue records as agricultural or cultivable, remaining outside municipal limits and never converted for non-agricultural use, was treated as agricultural land on a cumulative appraisal of all relevant facts; the sale gain was therefore not chargeable as capital gains and, on those facts, was not includible in book profit under section 115JB. A small existing structure on a negligible portion did not alter the character of the whole property, and the absence of declared agricultural income was not conclusive. However, an amount received under a compromise, settlement and withdrawal of litigation was not treated as sale consideration for the agricultural land, so it did not qualify for exemption and was taxable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>