https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456489 The HC allowed the petition challenging termination and blacklisting orders. The court found violation of natural justice principles as the impugned order was passed without reasons and without considering petitioner's reply to show cause notice. Although no blacklisting provision existed in the tender or agreement, the court noted SC precedent permitting blacklisting as a business decision. However, since the opposite party had extended the contract period without petitioner's request and without expressing dissatisfaction, the subsequent termination and blacklisting after contract expiry was unjustified and lacked proper reasoning. en-us Mon, 16 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Jul 2024 20:13:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456489 The HC allowed the petition challenging termination and blacklisting orders. The court found violation of natural justice principles as the impugned order was passed without reasons and without considering petitioner's reply to show cause notice. Although no blacklisting provision existed in the tender or agreement, the court noted SC precedent permitting blacklisting as a business decision. However, since the opposite party had extended the contract period without petitioner's request and without expressing dissatisfaction, the subsequent termination and blacklisting after contract expiry was unjustified and lacked proper reasoning. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 16 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456489