<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1364 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756144</link>
    <description>Delhi HC permitted withdrawal of application by substituted legal representatives of deceased defendant to file written statement with liberty as prayed. Court dismissed application seeking suit dismissal as infructuous under Companies Act 2013 Sections 248, 250 and Order XXII Rule 8 CPC. Court held company was made active for filing annual returns, NCLAT conditions were complied with, and company could not be considered dead with suit abated. Application lacked merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2024 10:02:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=762004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1364 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756144</link>
      <description>Delhi HC permitted withdrawal of application by substituted legal representatives of deceased defendant to file written statement with liberty as prayed. Court dismissed application seeking suit dismissal as infructuous under Companies Act 2013 Sections 248, 250 and Order XXII Rule 8 CPC. Court held company was made active for filing annual returns, NCLAT conditions were complied with, and company could not be considered dead with suit abated. Application lacked merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756144</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>