https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756136 The Tribunal had allowed the assessee's appeal by relying on High Court rulings on Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, but those rulings had been stayed by the Supreme Court and the constitutional validity of the rule was pending there. In that situation, the Tribunal's order could not stand. The Calcutta HC set aside the order and restored the matter to the Tribunal to remain pending until the Supreme Court decides the connected matters. en-us Tue, 09 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Jul 2024 10:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756136 The Tribunal had allowed the assessee's appeal by relying on High Court rulings on Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, but those rulings had been stayed by the Supreme Court and the constitutional validity of the rule was pending there. In that situation, the Tribunal's order could not stand. The Calcutta HC set aside the order and restored the matter to the Tribunal to remain pending until the Supreme Court decides the connected matters. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 09 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756136