<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Amount paid to Consulting firm for sourcing a strategic investor</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119235</link>
    <description>Consultancy fees paid as a success fee for sourcing a strategic investor are contested as revenue deductions; auditors and a tribunal applying the Brooke Bond principle treat expenses incurred to increase share capital as capital in nature. Accordingly, fees paid to identify investors are regarded as capital raising costs and are not allowable as revenue deductions, despite invoice coding and withholding under professional fees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jul 2024 12:10:53 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2025 10:40:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=761957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Amount paid to Consulting firm for sourcing a strategic investor</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119235</link>
      <description>Consultancy fees paid as a success fee for sourcing a strategic investor are contested as revenue deductions; auditors and a tribunal applying the Brooke Bond principle treat expenses incurred to increase share capital as capital in nature. Accordingly, fees paid to identify investors are regarded as capital raising costs and are not allowable as revenue deductions, despite invoice coding and withholding under professional fees.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jul 2024 12:10:53 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119235</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>