https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456471 Supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 is limited to cases where the subordinate court acts without jurisdiction, illegally, or with material irregularity, and it does not justify routine interference with a discretionary injunction order. Temporary injunction remains governed by the settled tests of prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury. The appellate court, on reappreciation of the record, found that the defendants were in possession of the suit property, declined to sustain the injunction, and still protected the property by restraining alienation and third-party rights. Suppression of the earlier suit and its outcome was treated as a material factor against equitable relief, and the High Court found no ground to interfere. en-us Tue, 14 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 28 Jul 2024 11:22:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456471 Supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 is limited to cases where the subordinate court acts without jurisdiction, illegally, or with material irregularity, and it does not justify routine interference with a discretionary injunction order. Temporary injunction remains governed by the settled tests of prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury. The appellate court, on reappreciation of the record, found that the defendants were in possession of the suit property, declined to sustain the injunction, and still protected the property by restraining alienation and third-party rights. Suppression of the earlier suit and its outcome was treated as a material factor against equitable relief, and the High Court found no ground to interfere. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 14 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456471