https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456474 Review jurisdiction is confined to discovery of new matter despite due diligence, error apparent on the face of the record, or an analogous sufficient reason; it cannot be used to reappreciate evidence, conduct a rehearing, or act as an appellate substitute. The text states that reliance on post-decree material and material from an authority without jurisdiction exceeded review powers, so the High Court's interference could not stand. It also states that a completed statutory forest-reservation process conclusively determines the land's status as reserved forest, and a later revenue proceeding or unchallenged suit for declaration and injunction cannot displace that finality. The impugned review order was set aside and the earlier appellate result restored. en-us Thu, 18 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 28 Jul 2024 11:22:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456474 Review jurisdiction is confined to discovery of new matter despite due diligence, error apparent on the face of the record, or an analogous sufficient reason; it cannot be used to reappreciate evidence, conduct a rehearing, or act as an appellate substitute. The text states that reliance on post-decree material and material from an authority without jurisdiction exceeded review powers, so the High Court's interference could not stand. It also states that a completed statutory forest-reservation process conclusively determines the land's status as reserved forest, and a later revenue proceeding or unchallenged suit for declaration and injunction cannot displace that finality. The impugned review order was set aside and the earlier appellate result restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 18 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456474