<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1340 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756120</link>
    <description>Receipts from overseas bandwidth and connectivity services were treated as non-royalty because the customers obtained only telecommunications services through the provider&#039;s own infrastructure, without dominion, possession or effective control over any process or equipment. The article also states that domestic amendments expanding the meaning of &quot;process&quot; in section 9(1)(vi) cannot be imported into a DTAA through Article 3(2) where royalty is already defined in the treaty, as unilateral statutory changes do not alter the negotiated treaty meaning. OSS/GBSA arrangements were likewise characterised as reciprocal service contracts for seamless connectivity and single billing, not as leases or licences of infrastructure, process or equipment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2024 12:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=761894" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1340 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756120</link>
      <description>Receipts from overseas bandwidth and connectivity services were treated as non-royalty because the customers obtained only telecommunications services through the provider&#039;s own infrastructure, without dominion, possession or effective control over any process or equipment. The article also states that domestic amendments expanding the meaning of &quot;process&quot; in section 9(1)(vi) cannot be imported into a DTAA through Article 3(2) where royalty is already defined in the treaty, as unilateral statutory changes do not alter the negotiated treaty meaning. OSS/GBSA arrangements were likewise characterised as reciprocal service contracts for seamless connectivity and single billing, not as leases or licences of infrastructure, process or equipment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756120</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>