<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1339 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756119</link>
    <description>An Assessing Officer cannot refuse a deduction merely because it was not separately debited in the return or profit and loss account when the Tribunal has already allowed the underlying claim on identical facts. The restriction against entertaining fresh claims applies at the assessment stage, but it does not permit the assessing authority to disregard a binding appellate direction. Once appellate relief has been granted, the consequential deduction must be implemented, and the disallowance cannot be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2024 16:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=761892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1339 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756119</link>
      <description>An Assessing Officer cannot refuse a deduction merely because it was not separately debited in the return or profit and loss account when the Tribunal has already allowed the underlying claim on identical facts. The restriction against entertaining fresh claims applies at the assessment stage, but it does not permit the assessing authority to disregard a binding appellate direction. Once appellate relief has been granted, the consequential deduction must be implemented, and the disallowance cannot be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>