<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (8) TMI 52 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37642</link>
    <description>Interest on borrowings raised for a new plant under construction before commencement of production had to be capitalised as part of the plant&#039;s cost, and could not be deducted against interest earned from temporary deposit of the unutilised funds because the borrowing was not taken for the purpose of earning that income. The expenditure therefore lacked the necessary nexus with the interim interest income. Amounts spent on purchase of loom hours were also not treated as revenue expenditure deductible in assessment, as the issue was covered by an earlier binding decision. The Revenue&#039;s position was upheld on both points.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 11:31:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (8) TMI 52 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37642</link>
      <description>Interest on borrowings raised for a new plant under construction before commencement of production had to be capitalised as part of the plant&#039;s cost, and could not be deducted against interest earned from temporary deposit of the unutilised funds because the borrowing was not taken for the purpose of earning that income. The expenditure therefore lacked the necessary nexus with the interim interest income. Amounts spent on purchase of loom hours were also not treated as revenue expenditure deductible in assessment, as the issue was covered by an earlier binding decision. The Revenue&#039;s position was upheld on both points.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37642</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>