<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (9) TMI 7 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37640</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the transfer of immovable properties by the assessee to his wife was not for adequate consideration. Therefore, the income from these properties should be included in the assessee&#039;s total income under Section 64(1)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was overturned, and the assessee was directed to pay the costs of the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 11:13:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (9) TMI 7 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37640</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the transfer of immovable properties by the assessee to his wife was not for adequate consideration. Therefore, the income from these properties should be included in the assessee&#039;s total income under Section 64(1)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was overturned, and the assessee was directed to pay the costs of the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>