https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756087 A later suit for arrears, warehousing charges and damages was held not to be barred where the earlier plaint expressly reserved those claims and leave to sue separately had been granted. The Court treated the two suits as arising from distinct causes of action and found no relinquishment or omission of the later reliefs, so Order II Rule 2 CPC did not apply. Because the second suit remained maintainable, rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC was also not warranted. en-us Wed, 10 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Jul 2024 08:31:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756087 A later suit for arrears, warehousing charges and damages was held not to be barred where the earlier plaint expressly reserved those claims and leave to sue separately had been granted. The Court treated the two suits as arising from distinct causes of action and found no relinquishment or omission of the later reliefs, so Order II Rule 2 CPC did not apply. Because the second suit remained maintainable, rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC was also not warranted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756087