<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1305 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756085</link>
    <description>The penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for disallowance of depreciation on non-compete fees was quashed. The appeal successfully argued that the penalty order lacked specific charges, was not in compliance with mandatory legal requirements, and was unjustified due to conflicting High Court views and pending Supreme Court adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2024 08:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=761807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1305 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756085</link>
      <description>The penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for disallowance of depreciation on non-compete fees was quashed. The appeal successfully argued that the penalty order lacked specific charges, was not in compliance with mandatory legal requirements, and was unjustified due to conflicting High Court views and pending Supreme Court adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756085</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>