<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1296 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756076</link>
    <description>HC found the GST registration cancellation disproportionate given the petitioner&#039;s actual business operations at an additional address. Despite errors in principal place of business documentation, the court directed respondents to verify the business premises within three weeks. If operations are satisfactory, GST registration would be restored upon rectifying address details.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 11:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=761793" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1296 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756076</link>
      <description>HC found the GST registration cancellation disproportionate given the petitioner&#039;s actual business operations at an additional address. Despite errors in principal place of business documentation, the court directed respondents to verify the business premises within three weeks. If operations are satisfactory, GST registration would be restored upon rectifying address details.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756076</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>