<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (2) TMI 38 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37629</link>
    <description>Statutory interest on enhanced land acquisition compensation accrues from day to day from the date possession is taken, because the right to receive it arises in praesenti even if the exact amount is quantified later. For income-tax purposes, such interest is chargeable in the previous years in which it accrues, not wholly in the year of actual receipt or final payment. The court therefore held that the interest was not taxable entirely in the later assessment year and answered the issue in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2017 10:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (2) TMI 38 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37629</link>
      <description>Statutory interest on enhanced land acquisition compensation accrues from day to day from the date possession is taken, because the right to receive it arises in praesenti even if the exact amount is quantified later. For income-tax purposes, such interest is chargeable in the previous years in which it accrues, not wholly in the year of actual receipt or final payment. The court therefore held that the interest was not taxable entirely in the later assessment year and answered the issue in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37629</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>