https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756041 The NCLAT dismissed an appeal challenging the allowance of an impleadment application. The appellant argued that no prior notice was given before being impleaded as a party. The NCLAT held that impleadment is the court's exclusive prerogative to determine whether a party is necessary for effective case resolution. The court found no error in allowing the impleadment application without prior notice to the party being impleaded, as it is within the court's discretion to decide on necessary parties to proceedings. en-us Wed, 24 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Jul 2024 09:07:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756041 The NCLAT dismissed an appeal challenging the allowance of an impleadment application. The appellant argued that no prior notice was given before being impleaded as a party. The NCLAT held that impleadment is the court's exclusive prerogative to determine whether a party is necessary for effective case resolution. The court found no error in allowing the impleadment application without prior notice to the party being impleaded, as it is within the court's discretion to decide on necessary parties to proceedings. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Wed, 24 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756041