<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1622 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456445</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the Assessee, directing the AO to delete the addition under Section 36(1)(va) concerning delayed EPF/ESI contributions, as they were deposited before filing the return. The tribunal found the disallowance unwarranted, relying on legal precedents and the Delhi HC&#039;s decision, and allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal. The issue of interest under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C was not extensively addressed due to the primary ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2024 20:02:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=761707" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1622 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456445</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the Assessee, directing the AO to delete the addition under Section 36(1)(va) concerning delayed EPF/ESI contributions, as they were deposited before filing the return. The tribunal found the disallowance unwarranted, relying on legal precedents and the Delhi HC&#039;s decision, and allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal. The issue of interest under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C was not extensively addressed due to the primary ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456445</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>