<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 1437 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456452</link>
    <description>ITAT Raipur allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against Pr. CIT&#039;s revision order u/s 263. The case involved assessment of income u/s 44AE for stone crusher business originally selected for limited scrutiny. ITAT held that assessee&#039;s disclosure of income through regular books of accounts, which exceeded presumptive income u/s 44AD, was not prejudicial to revenue interest. The AO&#039;s allowance of depreciation claim was not erroneous. ITAT set aside Pr. CIT&#039;s order and restored AO&#039;s assessment u/s 143(3).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2024 20:02:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=761700" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 1437 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456452</link>
      <description>ITAT Raipur allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against Pr. CIT&#039;s revision order u/s 263. The case involved assessment of income u/s 44AE for stone crusher business originally selected for limited scrutiny. ITAT held that assessee&#039;s disclosure of income through regular books of accounts, which exceeded presumptive income u/s 44AD, was not prejudicial to revenue interest. The AO&#039;s allowance of depreciation claim was not erroneous. ITAT set aside Pr. CIT&#039;s order and restored AO&#039;s assessment u/s 143(3).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>