<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1452 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456454</link>
    <description>ITAT Ahmedabad ruled against the assessee regarding delayed employees&#039; contribution to PF and ESI not deposited within prescribed due dates under PF and ESI Acts. The tribunal applied Section 36(1)(va) with Explanation-1, following the SC precedent in Checkmate Services (P.) Ltd. [2022 (10) TMI 617]. The addition was upheld as the issue had been settled by the SC, with ITAT finding no reason to prolong litigation on this matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2025 15:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=761698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1452 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456454</link>
      <description>ITAT Ahmedabad ruled against the assessee regarding delayed employees&#039; contribution to PF and ESI not deposited within prescribed due dates under PF and ESI Acts. The tribunal applied Section 36(1)(va) with Explanation-1, following the SC precedent in Checkmate Services (P.) Ltd. [2022 (10) TMI 617]. The addition was upheld as the issue had been settled by the SC, with ITAT finding no reason to prolong litigation on this matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>