https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456456 The AP HC dismissed all review petitions challenging appointments to constable and RSI posts. The petitioners argued that respondents' suppression of criminal case involvement constituted material fact suppression warranting disqualification. The HC held that review jurisdiction is limited to correcting errors apparent on record, not substituting views or re-hearing matters as appeals in disguise. Citing SC precedents, the court emphasized review cannot be exercised merely because decisions are arguably erroneous on merits. The judgments contained no apparent legal errors, and the petitions impermissibly sought re-litigation of previously decided issues. en-us Thu, 09 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Jul 2024 20:02:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456456 The AP HC dismissed all review petitions challenging appointments to constable and RSI posts. The petitioners argued that respondents' suppression of criminal case involvement constituted material fact suppression warranting disqualification. The HC held that review jurisdiction is limited to correcting errors apparent on record, not substituting views or re-hearing matters as appeals in disguise. Citing SC precedents, the court emphasized review cannot be exercised merely because decisions are arguably erroneous on merits. The judgments contained no apparent legal errors, and the petitions impermissibly sought re-litigation of previously decided issues. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 09 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456456