<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1242 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756022</link>
    <description>Petitioner challenged tax order on jurisdictional and limitation grounds. HC found the original order lacking substantive reasoning. Both parties agreed to remand the matter for fresh adjudication. Court directed Adjudicating Authority to reassess the order within eight weeks, preserving all legal contentions of the parties while setting aside the original order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 17:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=761654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1242 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756022</link>
      <description>Petitioner challenged tax order on jurisdictional and limitation grounds. HC found the original order lacking substantive reasoning. Both parties agreed to remand the matter for fresh adjudication. Court directed Adjudicating Authority to reassess the order within eight weeks, preserving all legal contentions of the parties while setting aside the original order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756022</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>