<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (10) TMI 6 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37618</link>
    <description>The Andhra Pradesh High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, an officer of a company, regarding the expenditure incurred on his wife during a foreign business tour. The court held that the expenditure on the wife could not be considered a perquisite to the assessee under section 17 of the Income Tax Act, as perquisites should be granted only to the employee and not to any member of the employee&#039;s family. The court distinguished this case from a previous decision and concluded that the expenditure on the wife did not constitute a benefit provided to the assessee. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, with costs awarded to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 10:27:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (10) TMI 6 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37618</link>
      <description>The Andhra Pradesh High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, an officer of a company, regarding the expenditure incurred on his wife during a foreign business tour. The court held that the expenditure on the wife could not be considered a perquisite to the assessee under section 17 of the Income Tax Act, as perquisites should be granted only to the employee and not to any member of the employee&#039;s family. The court distinguished this case from a previous decision and concluded that the expenditure on the wife did not constitute a benefit provided to the assessee. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, with costs awarded to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>