<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1988 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456419</link>
    <description>The ITAT Jaipur ruled on unexplained jewellery found during search operations, determining that jewellery belonging to joint family members should be assessed equally among all family members rather than solely against the family head. The addition of Rs 12,27,109 was reduced to Rs 245,422 (1/5th share) for the assessee. Regarding foreign investment allegations of USD 3,00,000, the tribunal found insufficient evidence beyond email communications to prove actual remittances occurred, deleting the entire addition. Foreign travel expenses of Rs 203,450 were also deleted as they were adequately explained through the assessee&#039;s drawings from capital account.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2024 13:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=761601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1988 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456419</link>
      <description>The ITAT Jaipur ruled on unexplained jewellery found during search operations, determining that jewellery belonging to joint family members should be assessed equally among all family members rather than solely against the family head. The addition of Rs 12,27,109 was reduced to Rs 245,422 (1/5th share) for the assessee. Regarding foreign investment allegations of USD 3,00,000, the tribunal found insufficient evidence beyond email communications to prove actual remittances occurred, deleting the entire addition. Foreign travel expenses of Rs 203,450 were also deleted as they were adequately explained through the assessee&#039;s drawings from capital account.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>