https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456417 Review under Section 114 and Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is confined to discovery of new and important matter despite due diligence, an error apparent on the face of the record, or a sufficient analogous reason. Grounds that were available in the original appeal but were not urged, including a change of counsel or a wish to advance fresh arguments, do not satisfy those limits. Review cannot be used as an appeal in disguise or as a means to obtain a rehearing on merits, and Section 151 cannot override the specific statutory restrictions. The review application was therefore not maintainable and was rightly rejected. en-us Fri, 25 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Jul 2024 18:00:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456417 Review under Section 114 and Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is confined to discovery of new and important matter despite due diligence, an error apparent on the face of the record, or a sufficient analogous reason. Grounds that were available in the original appeal but were not urged, including a change of counsel or a wish to advance fresh arguments, do not satisfy those limits. Review cannot be used as an appeal in disguise or as a means to obtain a rehearing on merits, and Section 151 cannot override the specific statutory restrictions. The review application was therefore not maintainable and was rightly rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 25 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456417