<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (11) TMI 5 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37608</link>
    <description>Formation of a partnership between a father and son, where the son contributed fresh capital and assumed reciprocal partnership obligations, was held not to involve a taxable gift under the Gift-tax Act, 1958. Any transfer of the father&#039;s interest in the goodwill of the proprietary business was treated as incidental to the partnership arrangement, not as a separate gratuitous transfer. The arrangement involved consideration in money or money&#039;s worth, and the statutory definition of &quot;gift&quot; was not satisfied merely because a transfer within the broader transfer definition could be assumed. The transaction was therefore not taxable as a gift.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 18:43:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (11) TMI 5 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37608</link>
      <description>Formation of a partnership between a father and son, where the son contributed fresh capital and assumed reciprocal partnership obligations, was held not to involve a taxable gift under the Gift-tax Act, 1958. Any transfer of the father&#039;s interest in the goodwill of the proprietary business was treated as incidental to the partnership arrangement, not as a separate gratuitous transfer. The arrangement involved consideration in money or money&#039;s worth, and the statutory definition of &quot;gift&quot; was not satisfied merely because a transfer within the broader transfer definition could be assumed. The transaction was therefore not taxable as a gift.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>