https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37602 The court held that the Tribunal had the power to restore cross-objections under Rule 24 of the Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963, if satisfied with the cause for non-appearance. The order setting aside the ex parte order in connection with cross-objections was deemed legal and just. The court ruled that cross-objections could challenge the entirety of the order of the AAC, rejecting the argument that they could only target specific parts. It was clarified that the restoration of cross-objections should not be impeded by technical distinctions between orders dismissed for default or heard ex parte. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower court's decision. en-us Mon, 03 Jul 1978 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Mar 2010 18:33:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37602 The court held that the Tribunal had the power to restore cross-objections under Rule 24 of the Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963, if satisfied with the cause for non-appearance. The order setting aside the ex parte order in connection with cross-objections was deemed legal and just. The court ruled that cross-objections could challenge the entirety of the order of the AAC, rejecting the argument that they could only target specific parts. It was clarified that the restoration of cross-objections should not be impeded by technical distinctions between orders dismissed for default or heard ex parte. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower court's decision. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 03 Jul 1978 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37602