https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755955 The Bombay HC granted anticipatory bail to an applicant charged with importing prohibited e-cigarettes through mis-declaration. The court found the applicant was not the importer, customs broker, or directly connected to the importing entity. The prosecution's case relied primarily on co-accused statements and money trail evidence. The HC determined there was insufficient prima facie material to establish the applicant's involvement with the consignment or warrant custodial interrogation. Bail was granted on furnishing a PR bond of Rs.50,000 with sureties. en-us Mon, 22 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Jul 2024 07:38:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755955 The Bombay HC granted anticipatory bail to an applicant charged with importing prohibited e-cigarettes through mis-declaration. The court found the applicant was not the importer, customs broker, or directly connected to the importing entity. The prosecution's case relied primarily on co-accused statements and money trail evidence. The HC determined there was insufficient prima facie material to establish the applicant's involvement with the consignment or warrant custodial interrogation. Bail was granted on furnishing a PR bond of Rs.50,000 with sureties. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 22 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755955