<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1172 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755952</link>
    <description>The power to cancel bail under Section 439(2) CrPC and the corresponding BNSS provision includes an incidental power to stay the operation of a bail order, but because bail restores liberty under Article 21, such interim restraint is a drastic measure. It may be granted only in rare and exceptional cases on a very strong prima facie showing for cancellation, with brief reasons recorded; ex parte stay should not be the normal course. On the facts, the stay was passed without hearing the accused or recording reasons and was continued despite repeated listings, while the cancellation application disclosed no misuse of liberty. The ex parte stay was therefore unjustified and set aside, leaving the cancellation merits open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 13:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=761405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1172 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755952</link>
      <description>The power to cancel bail under Section 439(2) CrPC and the corresponding BNSS provision includes an incidental power to stay the operation of a bail order, but because bail restores liberty under Article 21, such interim restraint is a drastic measure. It may be granted only in rare and exceptional cases on a very strong prima facie showing for cancellation, with brief reasons recorded; ex parte stay should not be the normal course. On the facts, the stay was passed without hearing the accused or recording reasons and was continued despite repeated listings, while the cancellation application disclosed no misuse of liberty. The ex parte stay was therefore unjustified and set aside, leaving the cancellation merits open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>